|
May/June
2002
COVER
PAGE PRACTICAL
INFORMATION REGIONAL
NEWS FEATURE
Masthead:
Learn more about WENR and its editorial staff.
Workshops: See a listing
of upcoming workshops sponsored by WES.
Search or Browse WENR Archives:
View back issues of this newsletter or search for specific words or terms.
Useful Links: See a
list of Web sites that may be helpful to WENR readers.
|
Feature
Recent Trends and Developments in Education in the Republic of Koreaby John
C. Weidman
(University of Pittsburgh)
1. Introduction Education
is one of the hottest topics in Korea at the moment and frequently makes
headline news in the mass media. Most Koreans believe that human capital
developed through education is their most valuable resource. Over the
years, the Ministry of Education has endeavored to implement various policies
aimed at expanding the country's system of higher education and increasing
access for students regardless of economic background. Although many of
these policies have been very effective in other countries, they have
met with only partial success at home. There have been so many reform
measures and laws introduced within the last 50 years or so that educational
policies in Korea are generally referred to as "forever changing
policies." The university entrance examination system, for example,
has been changed nearly 20 times since 1945. This article focuses on some recent trends and developments in Korean education in order to provide readers a brief overview of the current situation. For a more comprehensive analysis readers should refer to our book Higher Education in Korea: Tradition and Adaptation. 2. The Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development (MOE) The Ministry
of Education and Human Resources Development (MOE) was established
in January 2001 by restructuring and expanding the scope of the former
Ministry of Education. The minister of education was upgraded to the rank
of deputy prime minister and is now responsible for formulating and coordinating
policies on education and human-resource development in South Korea. The new ministry was developed specifically to meet the challenges of the emerging information- and knowledge-based economy by better preparing students to participate in the global community of entrepreneurs, technicians and researchers. It is still too early however, to determine whether or not the MOE will succeed in its mission. 3. Elementary and Secondary Education The MOE
has implemented a variety of reform measures in recent years, including
the 7th National
Curriculum Standards and Performance Assessment. In an effort to appease
the well-to-do families that send their children to foreign countries
for education, the MOE recently promulgated an independent private high
school policy aimed at keeping more students at home. In addition, the
ministry implemented an "alternative school" policy for students
with special needs, and was instrumental in facilitating the passage of
laws designed to promote both educational development in remote areas
and educational programs for gifted students. Beginning
in 1998, several new evaluation techniques were devised in the name of
the overarching concept of performance assessment. Unlike the former written
tests, a variety of performance-based evaluation methods are now used
to develop the student's abilities to understand and think in comprehensive
and creative ways. These include written exams, oral tests, discussions,
demonstrations, lab experiments, interviews, clinical observations, self-evaluations,
peer evaluations, written reports, research papers and portfolios. Not surprisingly,
the new assessment techniques have brought significant changes to elementary
and secondary education. In particular, they have significantly increased
the burden on teachers to successfully evaluate their students. To ameliorate
this burden, the MOE is planning to decrease the number of students per
classroom to less than 35. The ministry also plans to hire 23,600 additional
teachers by 2003. This initiative is called the "7.20 Educational
Condition Improvement Project." Another big
change in education concerns independent private high schools. Until recently
affluent parents whose children did not score high enough to enter an
elite school at home sent their children to private secondary schools
in foreign countries. To curb the outflow of these students the MOE established
new regulations for the establishment of independent private high schools,
granting them unprecedented autonomy in deciding tuition rates, admission
policies and curricula. The current policy on student discipline has also been reevaluated. In 1995 the implementation of a new education law forbade the use of physical punishment in schools, largely due to protests from parents. As a result, many teachers found that without the right to physically discipline their students they could no longer effectively control their classrooms. Beginning in March of this year, however, the MOE decided to re-allow the use of corporal punishment, despite the ongoing protests from parents. This time the ministry has formulated a detailed set of rules on procedure and methods governing the use of such punishment. 4. Higher Education Higher education
reform in Korea is geared mainly towards stimulating competition, assuring
accountability, globalization and encouraging online university offerings.
Perhaps the number one priority of the higher education sector in Korea
today is to educate and train highly qualified people who will become
leaders in an increasingly globalized information economy. To help achieve
this objective, the MOE is offering universities financial support to
conduct program and institutional self-evaluations. Other reform
initiatives include: no longer automatically granting tenure to newly
hired professors, but requiring a probationary period instead; adopting
a merit-based pay system for instructors; and strengthening program and
institutional evaluation. Not surprisingly, the changes in tenure and
salary restrictions are facing strong resistance from faculty. The majority
of Koreans, however, appear to support the changes. In addition,
initiatives are currently underway to establish an online university,
encourage the development of internationally competitive graduate programs,
and support the basic sciences. One alarming trend that is on the rise
is a noticeable decline in the number of students who choose to specialize
in natural sciences and engineering. In an attempt to reverse this trend
the Korean government is establishing an incentive program to encourage
enrollments in these fields. In 1999, the Ministry of Education launched a higher education reform project called Brain Korea 21, with the goal of training world-class research scholars needed for the 21st century. The project is geared towards reorganizing the overall higher education system in order to successfully meet the challenges of the new century, and will require an investment of $US 1.2 billion over the next seven years. According
to the MOE home page, the major objectives of the project are to: Also in 1999,
the Korean government commenced a seven-year project aimed at nurturing
regional universities that meet the demands and needs of local economies.
The overall goal of the project is to develop specialized programs in
each regional university that will be highly competitive both nationally
and internationally, so that these universities can attract more students.
It is hoped this project reduces the overwhelming student demand on Seoul-area
colleges. Funding for each task area is provided through a rigorous evaluation of universities and colleges. Applicants for the funds must form either a research team within a university or a consortium among universities. Universities are selected based on proven ability to provide world-class research opportunities and education, and demonstrated willingness to reform. Through this project, the government anticipates the development of three-to-four internationally renowned high-tech research universities. However, a recent mid-term evaluation on this project indicated it has not been as successful as expected so far. Specifically, critics argued that the process for choosing the programs to be funded was unfair. It was noted, for instance, that almost 50 percent of the project funds were allocated to a single elite institution, Seoul National University.
5. Teacher and Teacher-Training Reforms One of the
biggest changes affecting teachers in recent years has been the government's
decision to grant legal rights to the Korean Teachers' Union. Until 1999,
it was illegal for teachers to join the union, and nearly 2,000 teachers
lost their jobs because of their unwillingness to give up their union
membership. In 1999, the government of Kim Dae Jung legalized the Teachers
Union and allowed the dismissed teachers to return to their jobs. The
new law brought about major changes in schools as union members began
to actively participate in policymaking and management decisions. Although
this has led to disagreements at times, schools are now being managed
in an increasingly democratic manner. To enhance
the quality of teaching in South Korea, the MOE lowered the retirement
age of teachers, required systematic evaluation of teacher education programs
and institutions, and established a merit-based promotion and reward system.
The mandatory teacher retirement age was changed from 65 to 62 in the
fall of 1998. As a result, an estimated 16,000 teachers left the profession
and were replaced. However, the implementation of this reform measure
also resulted in unwanted side effects such as the lowering of teacher
morale and an unanticipated shortage of elementary school teachers. One of the
unexpected benefits stemming from the implementation the new reform measures
has been a noticeable increase in the quality of students graduating from
the elementary teacher training programs. While graduates of other programs
often have difficulty in finding jobs, the students coming out of elementary
teacher training programs are hired on the spot. The social
prestige and salary of teachers at all levels in Korea are relatively
high compared to other countries. Consequently, teacher-training programs
attract the top 5 percent of students. Because research has shown that
the quality of education is highly dependent on the quality of teachers,
this situation promises a bright future for the country. Not all recently
adopted teacher-training policies have been successful however. A 1998
policy designed to improve teacher-training through a comprehensive evaluation
of teacher- training colleges and graduate faculties of education was
not as effective as anticipated. A merit-based promotion and reward system
in which competent teachers would be given preferential treatment in promotion
was implemented in 2000, but this policy is now undergoing fundamental
changes because of resistance from teachers. In general, policies initiated
by the central government without the agreement and cooperation of the
pertinent organizations or groups have had limited success.
E-mail
your comments to the editor.
|
